Bitcoin ETFs Surge Ahead with $61.3M Inflows While Ethereum ETFs Struggle to Keep Up

In a sudden reversal of fortunes in ETF space, the Bitcoin ETF, specifically in the US, sung to a new record high inflow of $61.3 million on Monday while the Ethereum counterpart was facing outflows, as reported by media sources. Such disparity between these two prime digital currencies points to contradictory investor perceptions and market trends. Since last year, the Bitcoin ETFs have been under consideration, but still institutional investors are showing interest in such products. On the other hand, though, Ethereum ETF faces some problems and thus cannot sustain its progress.

Bitcoin ETFs Score Big with $61.3 Million Inflows

On Monday, the US spot Bitcoin ETFs experienced an influx of $61.3 million. This upsurge was majorly driven by Blackrock’s IBIT ETF that brought a rather large $72.15 million showing the driving confidence of the investors on Bitcoin in the near future. Fidelity’s FBTC ETF was a close second, adding $8.32 million overall to the year-end inflows.

However, there was no winner across all Bitcoin ETFs, although the above fund’s performance was rather impressive. BITB ETF, adopted by American firm, Bitwise, lost $9.67 million for the same period, with $9.50 lost by Ark Invest and 21Shares’ ARKB ETF.

Using information from sosovalue.xyz, overall, Bitcoin ETFs have remained quite robust for the year, with total net asset flows since 11th January standing at a colossal $18.86 billion. At this point, Bitcoin ETFs collectively hold $59.08 billion worth of Bitcoin, which is 4.69% of the BTC market cap. This rising flood of institutional money into Bitcoin ETFs has been viewed in stable in a positive light for Bitcoin as a digital asset.

Ethereum ETFs Face Setbacks with $822K in Outflows

On the other hand, Ethereum ETFs were not as lucky and posted net redemptions on Monday at $822,290. But this goes in line with previous trends where Ethereum base investment products are gradually losing interest as compared to other products such as Bitcoin ETFs.

Though the overall trend is negative, Blackrock’s ETHA ETF invested in Ethereum was an exception and showed an increase of $10.99 million in its holdings; it just shows that there is a demand for Ethereum ETFs. Nonetheless, Grayscale’s ETHE ETF provided a key head-turning loss in magnitude worth $11,81M. Since July 23, the total net outflows for Ethereum ETFs are now totaling $523.79 million which indicates that the market has turned bearish.

Advertisement Banner

As we speak, Ethereum ETFs have $7.14 billion in ether assets, respectively constituting a little over 2% of Ethereum’s market capitalization. This comes as a shock because Bitcoin ETFs enjoy a more dominant market stake in their product type compared to Gold’s market sentiment.

Market analysts have identified several reasons for Ethereum’s problems. “The market specialist added that the recent performance of Ethereum has been dragged down by continuous doubts over its shift to proof-of-stake and even the regulation section.”

Increases in the Disparity Between Bitcoin and Ethereum ETFs

The difference between Bitcoin and Ethereum ETFs represents the increasing difference in investor perceptions of the two dominant cryptocurrencies. While Bitcoin has continued to receive massive institutional buying, ethumane is displaying what appears to be a deteriorating market dominance, with outflows becoming common.

There is also an opportunity to explain these changes by the approach of consumers to the definition of Bitcoin as a more reliable means of storing money during crises. The institutional investors, in particular, appear to be using Bitcoin as an inflation and other macroeconomic factors hedge, a factor that has boosted the flow of assets into the next Bitcoin ETFs. This could be the reason for free flow in the Ethereum ETF as investors weigh as to whether to hold or opt-out.

However, it should be remembered that Ethereum still constitutes a big portion of the cryptocurrency market, and some investors believe that ETH has more room to grow. The fact that funds such as Blackrock’s ETHA avoided the negative sentiment that hit the rest of the space and were still able to post gains indicates that there is demand for Ethereum-related products.

Conclusion

This mismatch of the two ETFs, or rather the approval of Bitcoin ETF and rejection of Ethereum ETF, all goes to show the aspects and the fluctuating nature of the cryptocurrency market. While new assets for Bitcoin ETFs are still rising, indicating a soaring institutional demand, new assets for Ethereum ETFs are faltering, with recorded outflows suggesting that the buy-side institutions are losing their interest.

What has to be kept in mind is that these trends are going to change as the market of cryptocurrencies progresses in the future, especially, due to the change of the legal regulation and the development of innovations concerning Bitcoin and Ethereum. Keep following TheBITJournal and keep an eye on Bitcoin ETFs.

Follow us on Twitter and LinkedIn, and join our Telegram channel to be instantly informed about breaking news!