The leading cryptocurrency, Bitcoin, continues to demonstrate strength above $94,000. However, significant warnings are emerging from industry experts. One of the most notable voices is Justin Bons, the founder and CIO of Cyber Capital, who has raised concerns about Bitcoin’s potential vulnerability to a catastrophic “bank run.”
Bitcoin’s Scalability Issues: “It Can’t Handle Mass Exits”
In a detailed analysis shared on social media, Bons highlights what he sees as critical flaws in Bitcoin’s transaction capacity, self-custody model, and network security. He warns that these issues could destabilize the network and lead to devastating consequences for investors.
Bons points out Bitcoin’s limited capacity to handle only seven transactions per second (TPS) compared to other systems. Using data from Glassnode and Bitcoin’s code, he suggests that if a mass panic triggers simultaneous exits, Bitcoin’s 33 million on-chain users could face severe bottlenecks.
Under optimal conditions, Bons estimates that transaction queues could extend to 1.82 months. However, in practice, he predicts delays could worsen, with smaller users being effectively locked out unless they pay exorbitant fees. According to Bons:
“This limitation could spiral into a ‘death spiral,’ as declining prices force miners to shut down, further slowing the network. The resulting delays may exacerbate panic, creating a vicious cycle of dropping hash rates, slower block times, and falling prices.”
Bitcoin’s Role as a Speculative Asset
Bons criticizes Bitcoin’s transaction throughput, arguing that it falls short for real-world applications. By comparing Bitcoin’s 7 TPS to Visa’s 5,000 TPS or other decentralized solutions exceeding 10,000 TPS, Bons concludes:
“With 7 TPS, there are literally ZERO viable use cases for Bitcoin. Mass self-custody is a dangerous narrative. The only scalable path forward involves centralized custodians and banks, contradicting Bitcoin’s ethos as ‘freedom money.’”
He also highlights concerns about Bitcoin’s shrinking security budget, which could further amplify the risks he outlined. Bons claims this deviation from Bitcoin’s original vision as peer-to-peer (P2P) electronic cash undermines its practicality as a medium of exchange, reducing it to a speculative asset.
Heated Debate in the Crypto Community
Bons’ statements have sparked intense discussions across social media. Technology expert Patrick Flanagan dismissed the concerns, calling them unfounded:
“If this were going to happen, it would have happened years ago.”
Bons countered by arguing that the risk grows as Bitcoin’s user base increases. Other users highlighted alternatives like wrapped Bitcoin (WBTC) on Ethereum, which bypass Bitcoin’s base-layer limitations. While Bons acknowledged these alternatives, he warned that on-chain users might still face severe restrictions, amplifying panic-driven sell-offs.
The debate has also touched on Bitcoin’s self-custody model. DashPay’s Joel Venezuela remarked:
“This is something self-custody advocates should pay attention to. A small amount of FUD could trap users’ funds.”
The evolving narrative surrounding Bitcoin’s scalability and security remains a critical topic for crypto enthusiasts and investors alike.
For more insights and the latest updates on Bitcoin, stay tuned to The Bit Journal.
- https://twitter.com/Thebitjournal_
- https://www.linkedin.com/company/the-bit-journal/
- https://t.me/thebitjournal
Follow us on Twitter and LinkedIn and join our Telegram channel to be instantly informed about breaking news!