The crypto industry’s center of gravity in Asia is undergoing a rapid transformation, as two prominent exchanges, Bitget and Bybit, prepare to scale back operations in Singapore. This comes in response to a regulatory warning from the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS)
Singapore’s MAS has issued a sweeping directive ordering all digital token service providers without a full license under the Payment Services Act to cease serving overseas clients. This directive applies even to firms in the licensing pipeline, and includes offshore exchanges with international customers or front-office operations in the city-state. The ruling, effective by June 30, has triggered a high-stakes reckoning for the crypto firms operating under temporary exemptions.
In the clearest fallout yet, the Bitget and Bybit Singapore exit appears imminent, with both exchanges now exploring alternatives in more accommodating jurisdictions. Bitget has reportedly begun reassigning staff to Dubai and Hong Kong, while Bybit is assessing similar relocation plans.
Dubai and Hong Kong Beckon Amid Regulatory Tightening
Both Dubai and Hong Kong have emerged as top contenders for displaced exchanges, due to regulatory environments that are not only more transparent but also more progressive. Dubai’s Virtual Asset Regulatory Authority (VARA) has reportedly granted operational licenses to over 20 crypto firms, including Binance and Bybit. The emirate’s appeal lies in its streamlined licensing process, regulatory clarity, and favorable tax conditions.
Hong Kong, on the other hand, is making a strategic push to integrate crypto into its existing financial system. By emphasizing cross-border compatibility and infrastructure maturity, it has become a magnet for institutional players. As the Bitget and Bybit Singapore exit unfolds, these jurisdictions are poised to absorb significant talent and capital.
While neither exchange has formally confirmed a full departure, their actions signal growing urgency. Bitget’s relocation efforts appear to be in full swing, and sources familiar with the matter suggest that a more comprehensive exit strategy is being developed behind the scenes.
Singapore’s Waning Crypto Status After Regulatory Clampdown
Singapore was once regarded as the “Switzerland of Asia” for digital assets, attracting exchanges, hedge funds, and startups with its tech-forward reputation and regulatory flexibility. However, the collapse of homegrown platforms like Three Arrows Capital and Hodlnaut during the 2022 market downturn prompted a severe policy reversal.
Authorities have since curtailed advertising, warned retail investors, and narrowed the scope of permissible activities for crypto firms. MAS’s latest directive now removes even the grey area under which unlicensed firms could operate overseas from Singapore, significantly narrowing the country’s appeal to global crypto companies.
Industry insiders warn that the crackdown could cost Singapore dearly. Several stakeholders are expressing concern that the exodus triggered by the Bitget and Bybit Singapore exit may lead to widespread job losses and erode the country’s competitiveness in the digital finance economy. Once a magnet for innovation, Singapore is at risk of being viewed as a restrictive jurisdiction as firms redirect their operations to more inviting regions.
Industry Realignment or Temporary Shakeup?
What remains uncertain is whether the Bitget and Bybit Singapore exit is merely a reshuffling amid regulatory adaptation. Some exchanges, particularly those with strong retail ties or regional headquarters, may choose to stay and pursue full licensing. But the broader trend suggests that Singapore’s status as a crypto capital is waning in favor of ecosystems that better accommodate cross-border operations and compliance scalability.
MAS has not softened its stance. In a statement, the regulator emphasized that the crackdown aims to safeguard retail investors and maintain financial stability. It cited concerns over money laundering, asset volatility, and consumer protection.
Yet this caution may come at a cost. As leading firms explore relocation, Singapore risks losing its foothold in the fast-evolving digital asset economy. If the Bitget and Bybit Singapore exit materializes in full, it may be a harbinger of further departures from the country’s once-booming crypto sector.
Conclusion: A Critical Turning Point for Asia’s Crypto Map
The looming Bitget and Bybit Singapore exit represents more than a reaction to a single policy directive. It encapsulates the growing divergence in how Asian jurisdictions treat the crypto sector. While Singapore leans into regulatory conservatism, other regions are seizing the opportunity to reshape themselves as crypto-friendly financial centers.
In the months ahead, industry watchers will look for follow-through from Bitget and Bybit and whether other firms follow suit. If momentum continues to shift away from Singapore, it could permanently alter the regional balance of digital finance in Asia.
FAQs
Why are Bitget and Bybit exiting Singapore?
They are responding to a regulatory directive from Singapore’s MAS requiring all unlicensed crypto service providers to halt overseas operations by June 30, 2025.
What is the Payment Services Act in Singapore?
It’s a regulatory framework that mandates licensing for digital payment and crypto firms operating in or from Singapore.
Which countries are Bitget and Bybit considering next?
Dubai and Hong Kong are being evaluated due to their clear regulatory structures and pro-crypto policies.
How will this affect Singapore’s crypto market?
Industry experts warn that the exit of leading exchanges could lead to job losses and reduce Singapore’s relevance as a crypto hub.
Is Bybit officially leaving Singapore?
Bybit has not confirmed a full exit, but reports suggest it is exploring relocation options in response to regulatory pressure.
Glossary
MAS (Monetary Authority of Singapore): Singapore’s central bank and financial regulatory authority, responsible for overseeing the crypto sector under laws like the Payment Services Act.
Payment Services Act: Singapore law requires firms dealing in digital tokens and payments to obtain licenses and comply with AML/CFT guidelines.
VARA (Virtual Asset Regulatory Authority): The regulatory body for digital assets in Dubai, offering operational licenses and governance for crypto companies.
Digital Token Service Providers: Companies that facilitate transactions involving cryptocurrencies, including exchanges and custodians.
Front-office operations: Client-facing activities such as sales, trading, and customer support, which can bring firms under local regulatory scrutiny.
Source
For advertising inquiries, please email . [email protected] or Telegram
