Elon Musk’s social media platform, X, is in the spotlight due to alleged violations of the European Union’s Digital Services Act (DSA), potentially facing fines of up to $200 million. The recent findings by the EU, termed X EU fines, have raised significant concerns over the platform’s compliance with critical regulations.
The European Union released documents on July 12 revealing that X, formerly known as Twitter and now owned by Elon Musk, breached the DSA on three counts. According to the EU’s report, these violations relate to “dark patterns, advertising transparency, and data access for researchers.” The potential fines could amount to 6% of X’s global annual turnover, which translates to approximately $200 million.
Thierry Breton, EU Internal Market Commissioner, noted on X that while the findings are serious, they are not final. X has been granted “the right of defence,” allowing the platform to present its case before any penalties are officially imposed.
The DSA aims to create a safer digital space by setting clear obligations for online platforms to manage and mitigate risks. The allegations against X suggest failures in several key areas, which, if proven, could set a precedent for how social media platforms operate within the EU.
X EU Fines: Broader Implications and Industry Reactions
Advertisement Banner
The scrutiny of X comes at a time when digital platforms are under increasing pressure to comply with stringent regulations globally. The potential X EU fines have sparked a broader discussion about social media giants’ responsibilities in protecting user data and ensuring transparency in their operations.
Meanwhile, the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) is facing its own set of challenges. Whistleblowers have approached the SEC regarding OpenAI’s use of non-disclosure agreements (NDAs), alleging that these NDAs are illegal. According to a complaint filed in June, OpenAI may have unlawfully restricted former employees from discussing safety and other concerns with federal agents. This case was brought to light by the Washington Post through Senator Chuck Grassley’s office, who supported the whistleblowers, emphasizing the need for OpenAI to revise its NDA policies.
Another significant development is that the crypto exchange BitMEX has pleaded guilty to violating the Bank Secrecy Act. The United States Department of Justice confirmed that BitMEX failed to establish, implement, and maintain an Anti-Money Laundering (AML) program. US Attorney Damian Williams criticized BitMEX for “flaunting” AML requirements by not adhering to Know Your Customer (KYC) standards.
The legal landscape for crypto firms has also been reshaped by the United States Supreme Court’s decision in the Loper Bright v. Raimondo case. This ruling overturned the precedent set by the Chevron U.S.A., Inc. vs. Natural Resources Defense Council case from 1984, which required courts to defer to federal agencies when interpreting ambiguous statutes. Joshua Simmons, a partner at Wiley Rein, described this change as a “game changer,” predicting it will have a long-term impact by allowing more companies to challenge federal agencies on a level playing field.
As Elon Musk’s X navigates the potential X EU fines, the platform’s response will be closely watched by industry stakeholders and regulators alike. The allegations and subsequent actions could influence future regulatory frameworks and enforcement strategies within the EU and beyond.
For now, X has the opportunity to defend itself against the EU’s findings. However, the broader implications for the social media industry cannot be ignored. The case highlights the increasing importance of compliance with digital regulations and the potential consequences of failing to meet these standards.
Stay connected to The BIT Journal for more updates on X EU fines and other significant developments in the digital and crypto spaces.
