Bitcoin ETF Outflows: IBIT Posts Its Biggest Exit Since June

The bit journal logo
8 Min Read
IBIT recorded its largest daily withdrawal since June on November 2.

Bitcoin ETF outflows were substantial on November 2, with BlackRock’s iShares Bitcoin Trust (IBIT) shedding $405.3 million, according to Farside Investors data reported by Cointelegraph. U.S. spot Bitcoin funds ended the session with $398.6 million in combined net withdrawals, as inflows into other funds partly offset IBIT’s larger exit.

The single-day IBIT withdrawal was its biggest since June 26. It adds to a weak stretch for the funds, which recorded net outflows in October and were about $38 million in the red for 2026 as of November 3, Cointelegraph reported.

  • IBIT’s $405.3 million outflow on November 2 was the fund’s largest since June 26, when it lost $444.5 million.
  • All U.S. spot Bitcoin ETFs recorded $398.6 million in net outflows that day.
  • Fidelity’s FBTC brought in $6.7 million, helping explain why sector-wide net outflows were smaller than IBIT’s withdrawal.
  • U.S. spot Bitcoin ETFs lost $515 million net in October, their first negative month since June, according to Cointelegraph.
  • Bitcoin traded at $76,733 at 09:13 UTC on November 3, down 1.89% over 24 hours, according to CoinGecko market data.

Timeline of Bitcoin ETF outflows

  1. October 29, 2026: Binance said its hot wallets were compromised at about 20:05 UTC, resulting in roughly $6.3 billion in token losses. The exchange said it would cover the impact and that about $3 billion had been frozen on-chain.
  2. October 30: U.S. spot Bitcoin ETFs saw $643.3 million in outflows, their largest daily exit since June 25, according to CoinDesk. IBIT led with $233.7 million in withdrawals. CoinDesk linked market concerns that day to the Binance security incident.
  3. October 31: Binance said 90% of stolen assets had been replenished. It also said BTC, ETH, USDT, BNB, SOL, USDC, XRP, USD1, RLUSD and ZEC were fully backed at that point.
  4. November 2: IBIT lost $405.3 million, while all U.S. spot Bitcoin ETFs recorded $398.6 million in net outflows. FBTC’s $6.7 million inflow partly offset withdrawals elsewhere.
  5. November 3: Cointelegraph reported the flow figures and said the funds were about $38 million net negative for the year to date.
Empty glass security gates in a financial district lobby at night
Recent exchange security concerns formed part of the market backdrop.

Background: why Bitcoin ETF outflows matter

U.S. spot Bitcoin ETFs launched in January 2024. Their daily flows show the net movement of money into or out of the funds, but a net outflow alone does not identify why investors moved money or establish a lasting change in sentiment.

The November 2 total also needs context. IBIT’s $405.3 million withdrawal was larger than the sector’s $398.6 million net outflow because some funds took in money, including FBTC. That difference is a reminder that the aggregate can hide sharp moves in individual products.

The latest session follows a difficult month. October’s $515 million net outflow made it the first negative month since June. That month, U.S. spot Bitcoin ETFs lost $4.5 billion, their largest monthly outflow since launching in January 2024. IBIT accounted for $3.55 billion of June’s withdrawals, according to The Block.

Security worries form part of the immediate backdrop, but the available figures do not prove that the Binance incident caused the November 2 withdrawals. CoinDesk connected the October 30 fund exits with market concern about the incident; that is a reported link to that session, not evidence of a single cause for every later outflow.

A sealed server cabinet in a secure data center
Binance reported that its hot wallets were compromised on October 29.

Reactions and market context

Brickken CEO Edwin Mata told Cointelegraph on November 2 that he would not read the withdrawals as a rejection of digital assets. He suggested investors could be reducing exposure amid uncertainty and concerns over market-infrastructure security. That is his interpretation; the flow data alone cannot confirm investors’ motives.

Bitcoin’s price was $76,733 at 09:13 UTC on November 3, with a 24-hour decline of 1.89% and a seven-day decline of 3.98%, according to CoinGecko data. The Crypto Fear & Greed Index stood at 26, classified as “Fear,” on November 3. These readings describe a cautious market backdrop, but they do not establish that ETF withdrawals drove the price move.

Binance’s account of its response is available in its security incident update. The exchange and ETF figures describe separate developments. Mata’s comments linked market-infrastructure security concerns with investors’ decisions to reduce exposure, but the available evidence does not establish the cause of the November 2 flows.

Outlook: what to watch after the Bitcoin ETF outflows

Subsequent daily flow reports will show whether outflows continue across the group or become concentrated in one fund. Further sessions will also show whether October’s weak monthly trend carries into November. The November 2 figures alone do not establish whether a longer-term pattern has changed.

Further verified updates about Binance’s recovery and security response may clarify the incident’s status, but they will not necessarily explain ETF decisions. The Binance incident involved reported token losses, and the exchange said it would cover the impact rather than pass it to users. The evidence provided does not establish that this outcome removes risks associated with exchange security or digital-asset markets.

Reported fund flows describe the movement of money on the dates stated. They do not predict future returns, and the market data provided shows Bitcoin’s price was down over the preceding 24 hours, seven days, and 30 days as of November 3.

An empty institutional trading floor in early morning light
Subsequent daily fund-flow reports will show whether outflows continue.

Bitcoin ETF outflows FAQ

What do Bitcoin ETF outflows mean?

They mean that, over the reported period, withdrawals from the funds exceeded incoming money. The figure does not explain why investors withdrew or prove what Bitcoin’s price will do next.

Why did IBIT’s outflow exceed the sector total?

IBIT lost $405.3 million on November 2, while U.S. spot Bitcoin ETFs had $398.6 million in net outflows. Inflows into other products, including FBTC’s $6.7 million, reduced the combined net figure.

Was November 2 the biggest IBIT outflow ever?

No. Cointelegraph reported that the $405.3 million withdrawal was the fund’s largest since June 26, when IBIT lost $444.5 million. The data provided does not establish a record for the fund’s full history.

Sources

This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial or investment advice. Cryptocurrencies are highly volatile; always do your own research before investing.

Advertising

For advertising inquiries, please email . [email protected] or Telegram

Share This Article
Leave a Comment