Cointelegraph reported a 13% RUNE price jump after what its headline described as a $6.3 billion Binance hack. The report was published on October 30, 2026, at 09:52 UTC. Its supplied excerpt also describes earlier use of THORChain by North Korean hackers to move stolen funds, but does not establish that funds from the newly reported incident reached the protocol.
Why it matters
The reported gain and THORChain’s earlier involvement in stolen-fund transfers are separate claims. The available material supports attributing both to Cointelegraph, but it does not establish a new transfer through THORChain or explain why RUNE rose.
What we know about the RUNE price jump
Cointelegraph’s headline reports a 13% RUNE gain and describes the Binance incident as a record $6.3 billion hack. Those figures, including the record characterization, are the outlet’s reported claims, not independently verified findings presented here.
The supplied excerpt says North Korean hackers previously used THORChain to move funds stolen from Bybit and Bitget. It also says that activity prompted calls for the protocol to intervene. It does not identify who made those calls or describe a response from THORChain.
That history provides context, not proof of a repeat. The earlier transfers do not establish the route taken by funds in the newly reported incident, identify its perpetrators or explain the reported token gain.
The source material available for this review consists of the article’s headline, publication details and a short excerpt. It does not include a full account of the alleged Binance breach. Conclusions about the incident therefore need to remain narrower than the headline alone might suggest.

What is still unclear
The available Cointelegraph material does not provide a RUNE spot price, a precise measurement window for the 13% gain or trading-volume figures. It supports describing a reported RUNE price jump, but not calculating its dollar increase or determining whether it lasted through the day.
Nor does the excerpt include transaction hashes, destination addresses or an official THORChain response concerning the Binance incident. There is no basis in that material to state that the protocol processed any of the newly reported stolen funds.
Attribution requires the same restraint. Cointelegraph’s reference to North Korean hackers concerns earlier movements of funds stolen from Bybit and Bitget. It should not be treated as confirmation of who carried out the alleged Binance attack.
The word “after” establishes sequence in the headline, not a demonstrated cause. The supplied excerpt contains no trader commentary or trading analysis explaining the gain. It also offers no transaction evidence connecting the alleged incident to new activity on THORChain.
What the later market snapshot shows
RUNE price report and broader losses have different timestamps
The reported gain can be placed alongside a later, weaker market snapshot, with an important timing caveat. According to the supplied CoinGecko data, Bitcoin, Ethereum and BNB were down over the preceding 24 hours at 20:13 UTC on October 30, 2026.
| Asset | USD price | 24-hour change |
|---|---|---|
| Bitcoin (BTC) | $76,886 | -4.32% |
| Ethereum (ETH) | $2,238.34 | -3.29% |
| BNB (BNB) | $699.86 | -5.32% |
All table prices refer to that 20:13 UTC snapshot. The percentages measure each asset’s preceding 24-hour change, not its movement since publication of the Cointelegraph report. They do not establish that the alleged Binance incident caused any of those declines.
The supplied CoinGecko Bitcoin snapshot also records a 24-hour high of $79,563 and a low of $76,338. Those figures describe Bitcoin’s recorded range, not RUNE’s performance or a verified reaction to the alleged hack.
No named analyst assessment or price forecast appears in the supplied Cointelegraph excerpt. Without a matching RUNE snapshot, the later market figures cannot establish whether RUNE was still outperforming those assets at 20:13 UTC.

What readers can conclude
The central distinction is between a reported token move and evidence of protocol activity. The headline supplies the former. The excerpt supplies historical context, but no documented connection between THORChain and funds from the newly reported Binance incident.
The missing measurement window also limits how the 13% figure can be interpreted. It does not establish RUNE’s current price, the size of any subsequent reversal or whether the gain remained intact when the later CoinGecko figures were recorded.
The supplied evidence contains no assessment of RUNE’s investment suitability or THORChain’s security. Nothing in the reported gain establishes that the token or protocol is safe, and this account makes no recommendation to buy, sell or hold it.
Evidence that would help resolve the gaps includes an official exchange update, attributable transaction tracing and a THORChain statement addressing any identified flows. A timestamped RUNE market snapshot would also allow a more precise comparison with the other assets.
Bottom line
Cointelegraph reported a 13% RUNE price gain after an alleged $6.3 billion Binance hack and recalled earlier stolen-fund transfers through THORChain. The supplied material does not independently verify the incident, explain the gain or establish a connection between the newly reported theft and the protocol.
Sources
- THORChain’s RUNE jumps 13% after Binance’s record $6.3B hack (Cointelegraph)
This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial or investment advice. Cryptocurrencies are highly volatile; always do your own research before investing.

