Ripple Custody Brings Ethereum and Solana Staking to Institutions

Jonathan Swift
5 Min Read

This article was first published on The Bit Journal.

Ripple is pushing its custody business beyond safekeeping; in a February 2026 update, Ripple Custody enabled staking for Ethereum and Solana through an integration with Figment, aimed at banks, fintechs, and asset managers that want rewards without operating validator infrastructure. The core idea is that institutional crypto staking should feel like a standard custody feature, not a side project held together with vendors.

Why institutional crypto staking is moving into custody rails

Institutions rarely skip staking because they dislike yield as they skip it because governance, audits, and key management can turn a simple concept into a long procurement cycle. When staking sits inside custody, institutional crypto staking becomes easier to approve, easier to monitor, and easier to explain, much like familiar services in traditional finance where controls and reporting come built in.

Ripple says Figment powers the staking layer while clients keep institutional controls around assets, and Figment describes its setup as non-custodial staking infrastructure. Ripple also paired the rollout with security and compliance upgrades, including a partnership with Securosys, signaling the target audience is the risk committee.

What changes for Ethereum and Solana exposure

Ethereum and Solana are natural first picks because their staking economies are used. Instead of building validator operations or juggling a separate staking provider, a firm can route staking through the same custody workflow used for approvals, policy enforcement, and recordkeeping. Institutional crypto staking becomes easier to deploy at scale when it lives where the assets already live.

Ripple Custody Brings Ethereum and Solana Staking to Institutions

Validator risk, simplified but not erased

Validator risk is the quiet reason many pilots stall. Ethereum validators can face penalties when operations go wrong, while Solana outcomes can be sensitive to performance and delegation choices. Custody-based institutional crypto staking does not make those risks vanish, but it can move daily operations into a managed layer with accountability, monitoring, and fewer points of failure. For institutional crypto staking, that shift is often the whole point.

Flows show a market that still cares about access

Demand signals are shifting quickly. One recent weekly digital-asset fund flows snapshot showed $63.1M of inflows for XRP products, versus $8.2M for Solana and $5.3M for Ethereum, while Bitcoin products saw $264M of outflows. Those numbers do not explain why money moved, but they underline why institutional crypto staking keeps becoming a default question, since investors increasingly compare assets on price action and on how easily yield can be accessed within regulated rails.

Does this create XRP yield

XRP does not offer protocol-level staking like Ethereum and Solana, so there is no native mechanism that turns XRP holdings into staking rewards. Still, as institutional crypto staking becomes normal for proof-of-stake assets, investors will keep looking for yield-like exposure through lending or structured products that fit compliance rules. The  Ripple custody upgrade does not change XRP economics, but it does raise expectations for what a single institutional platform should deliver.

Conclusion

Ripple Custody adding staking for Ethereum and Solana is a practical step toward making institutional crypto staking boring in the best way, controlled, auditable, and easier to operationalize.

FAQs about Ripple Custody

How does this help institutions start staking?

It lets institutional crypto staking run through custody approvals and reporting, reducing the need to build validator operations.

Is this XRP staking?

No. The feature here is for Ethereum and Solana, while XRP has no protocol staking rewards.

Why does custody matter?

Institutional crypto staking inside custody reduces operational sprawl and strengthens oversight.

Glossary

Institutional crypto staking: Staking designed for regulated firms with governance and reporting.

Custody: Secure storage and controlled management of digital assets.

Validator: Infrastructure that secures a proof-of-stake network and earns rewards.

Non-custodial staking: Staking where the provider operates infrastructure without owning assets.

Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment, legal, or tax advice.

Sources

cryptoslate

Disclaimer

The price predictions and financial analysis presented on this website are for informational purposes only and do not constitute financial, investment, or trading advice. While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, the volatile nature of cryptocurrency markets means that prices can fluctuate significantly and unpredictably.

You should conduct your own research and consult with a qualified financial advisor before making any investment decisions. The Bit Journal does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of any information provided in the price predictions, and we will not be held liable for any losses incurred as a result of relying on this information.

Investing in cryptocurrencies carries risks, including the risk of significant losses. Always invest responsibly and within your means.

Advertising

For advertising inquiries, please email . [email protected] or Telegram

Share This Article
Follow:
A writer with understanding of blockchain technology and the digital economy. I have written content for leading crypto publications, and blockchain protocols. Passionate about creative ideas, engaging stories that connect with readers, from curious beginners to seasoned experts. I believe words are more than just sentences; they are the children of the mind, carrying thoughts, emotions, and visions of the future.
Leave a Comment